§ Volunteer Form

Click here to fill out our volunteer form. We can help you identify what you would like to do to help the unborn, and then connect you with either our efforts or other efforts near you

§ What is Pro-Life Unity?

To achieve Pro-Life Unity we will establish standards that we all agree upon, and efforts that we all regularly participate in. By working together we can challenge the culture of death and the apathy which is pervasive in our society.

§ Action Code

Help promote the Pro-Life Action Calls which are put out by Pro-Life organizations nationwide.

.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) to email us and we will send you the Action Code & sign you up as a member of Pro-Life Unity. Your site will be listed on the Members page

§ Life Principles

Click here for the timeless Life Principles that were established over 30 years ago by the March for Life Education and Defense Fund.


NOAA Refuses to Release Data

image


The Washington Post article States:

"The Obama administration is continuing to resist efforts by a top House Republican to gain access to the internal deliberations article article of federal scientists who authored a groundbreaking global warming study the lawmaker is investigating.

In response to a threat from House Science Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R-Tex.) to subpoena Commerce Secretary Penny Pritzker, the head of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration told Smith in a letter Friday that her staff will not be influenced by political interference.

I have not or will not allow anyone to manipulate the science or coerce the scientists who work for me,” 

 

My first question is, who does she think she is?

Secretary Penny Pritzker is the head of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, not the CIA.

Next, Democrats will manipulate the science on global warming and “climate change” whenever possible. It is their cash cow, and they make hundreds of billions of dollars on it.

As far as manipulating the science and coercing the scientists, it is likely most scientists in the world today are out right scared of the tyrants who run science programs, either private or government.

Democrats claim that “deniers” of climate change are either uninformed or lack credentials. They believe they are the only ones smart enough to understand what’s happening in the world, so they won’t listen to anyone Who opposes them.

There are many intelligent scientists who agree this climate change cash cow has gone too far. An article in Climate Depot states:

Prominent Scientists Declare Climate Claims Ahead of UN Summit ‘Irrational’ – ‘Based On Nonsense’ – ‘Leading us down a false path’


Some of the scientists said:

MIT Climate Scientist Dr. Richard Lindzen: ‘Demonization of CO2 is irrational at best and even modest warming is mostly beneficial.’ - ‘When someone says this is the warmest temperature on record. What are they talking about? It’s just nonsense. This is a very tiny change period.’

Princeton Physicist Dr. Will Happer: ‘Policies to slow CO2 emissions are really based on nonsense. We are being led down a false path. To call carbon dioxide a pollutant is really Orwellian. You are calling something a pollutant that we all produce. Where does that lead us eventually?’

Greenpeace Co-Founder Dr. Patrick Moore: ‘We are dealing with pure political propaganda that has nothing to do with science.’


House Science Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R-Tex.) is not just some quack off the street. He is the House Science Committee Chairman! He has a right to know how Democrats are using American tax dollars.

Smith says “a groundbreaking global warming study was “rushed to publication” over the objections of numerous scientists at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

Whistleblowers stepped forward to say the NOAA is obviously not acting objectively.

Secretary Pritzker makes it seem like they are the ones who live in fear of losing their jobs or being in properly attacked, when the opposite is true.

Let’s look at some reality.

New York AG Tries to Criminalize Scientific Dissent on Climate Change in Soviet-Style Investigation


AG Schneiderman subpoenaed extensive financial records, emails and other documents of Exxon Mobil to investigate whether the company “lied to the public about the risks of climate change or to investors about how such risk might hurt the oil business.”

Very friendly, wouldn’t you agree?

Next, would climate change fruitcakes use RICO laws to arrest people who disagree with them? Sounds insane doesn’t it?

Twenty alarmist climate scientists – including UN IPCC lead author Kevin ‘Travesty’ Trenberth – have written a letter to President Obama urging him to use RICO laws to crush dissent by climate skeptics. Their hypocrisy and dishonesty, especially that of the main signatory, almost defies belief.


Yep, this is an actual tactic proposed by Democrats.

And, this month from Paris:

PARIS (AP) — A weather forecaster for French state television has been fired after releasing and promoting a book criticizing politicians, scientists and others for what he calls an exaggerated view of climate change.


Let’s not forget Secretary of State John Kerry who said:

“Bar Global warming Skeptics From Elected Office”


How’s that for a litmus test? “What? You don’t agree with global warming? Get out of here!
 
Let’s not forget the New York Times who said climate deniers have “an intellectual stance that is uncomfortably close to Hitler’s”

Let’s go back to the headline from the beginning, “The Obama administration is continuing to resist efforts by a top House Republican.”

Not only are Obama and his minions stonewalling an investigation, once again, they’re demonizing those who disagree with them, again.

Over the years, Democrats have become emboldened. Since 1965 they packed the United States with tens of millions of illegals. Recently, they’ve taken over our healthcare system, they’ve ruined our energy system, they’ve taken over our schools and they’re destroying our military.

Unfortunately, Republicans have done nothing to stop them. If anything, unfortunately, Republicans have helped Democrats achieve their goals!

I pray things are changing. I pray conservative Republicans step forward to defend what made this country great. It is written that we have the rights to “Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” Democrats have taken away all three, at least from anyone who doesn’t agree with them.

Peter Shinn
President
Pro-Life Unity
United we stand ~ Divided they die

Director
Cherish Life Ministries
Empowering Christians to effectively communicate life issues

Co-Founder
Prayer Pivot

Co-Founder
Teen Defenders

Co-Founder
Artists for Life

YouTube

Personal website

Facebook

LinkedIn

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
Posted by Turnstile on 11/25 at 02:38 AM
ColumnistsPeter ShinnCommentary • (0) CommentsPermalink

Call to defund Planned Parenthood Now

Father Frank Pavone Pro-Life Alert - Click here to Call Congress Now to defund Planned Parenthood and save babies!

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
Posted by Turnstile on 10/22 at 10:10 AM
ColumnistsPeter Shinn • (0) Comments • (0) TrackbacksPermalink

Video - Growing up in a culture of abortion



"Since 2010, abortion has declined by 12% in our country. But, any baby lost to abortion is a loss, and we're losing over 3000 a day."

Alison Howard

Renee Pillor, Vice President of Pro-Life Unity and Vice President of Cherish Life Ministries, talks to Alison Howard, Director of Alliance Relations at Alliance Defending Freedom.

The event they attended was the "Road to Majority" conference in Washington DC.

http://prolifeunity.com/
http://cherishlifeministries.com/
http://www.adflegal.org/

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
Posted by Turnstile on 09/01 at 07:50 AM
ColumnistsRenee PillorNewsPro-Life UnityVideoPermalink

FOX Panelist Defends Planned Parenthood Government Funding

By Jack Yoest

Bruce Japsen claims access to Parent Parenthood is necessary in ‘Forbes on Fox’ discussion about defunding.

Watch the video clip here.

Bruce Japsen, a Forbes contributor who writes about health care, defended the continued federal funding of Planned Parenthood’s 700 health centers. He said that people calling for defunding were essentially saying if patients “like their [Planned Parenthood] health center, they can’t keep it.”

Japsen made that defense during a debate over Planned Parenthood defunding on “Forbes on FOX” on Aug. 8, 2015. His position was in the minority, with several others guests saying the group should lose federal funding.

Later in the broadcast he also refused to address the “picking apart of human bodies” by arguing there is a health care “access” problem for low-income people and strongly implied Planned Parenthood is the solution for education on “whether to have a child or not” and for “outpatient services” like pap smears.

“Isn’t that a good thing,” Japsen asked. His claims echoed the talking points of Planned Parenthood CEO Cecile Richards who has been on defense as undercover videos surfaced about the abortion-provider.

The notion government subsidies must continue, they claim, because women depend on them as a last-line of healthcare defense is one of Richards’ claims: “Planned Parenthood is their only doctor…”

In defending Planned Parenthood, Japsen overlooked some important statistics…

Read the story Forbes Contributor Defends Planned Parenthood in Fox Debate

Be sure to follow Your Business Professor on Twitter.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
Posted by Jack & Charmaine Yoest on 08/20 at 02:34 PM
(0) CommentsPermalink

Why are Christian and pro-life leaders / media outlets giving Dr. Ben Carson a pass?

I'm sure this article isn't going to make many friends, so be it.

I like Dr. Ben Carson, I just think sometimes he makes statements that aren't very smart, and then he doubles down when he should step back and reconsider.

The latest controversy has to do with his response to a research paper he wrote where he refers to humans who were killed by abortion as "specimens." It doesn't end there.

Read my article at PeterShinn.com.

Peter

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
Posted by Turnstile on 08/14 at 04:50 AM
ColumnistsPeter ShinnCommentaryLife & LibertyPro-Life UnityBio-Ethics • (0) CommentsPermalink

Abortion Clinic Near San, Diego California Closes After Abortionist Takes an Early Retirement

A Southern California abortion clinic that had long been the site of pro-life outreaches has unexpectedly closed.
Read more

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
Posted by News Hound on 08/11 at 04:36 PM
NewsPermalink

What Is Needed To Get Your Message Understood?

by Jack Yoest

taffy

Consistency.


The wrong combination of what the small business offers and then delivers can leave a bad taste.


The salt-water taffy candy tasted terrible. It was safe to eat and would hurt nothing but sales. And it was my fault.


Your (much younger) Business Professor did it on purpose. It started as a noble experiment but then devolved into a base prank.


One summer, I was working as a candy cook with two other bored confederates. We dreamed up a chemistry research project combining two of the five senses: color coordination and a taste response.


No animals were hurt in this human testing.


Our hypothesis was simple, “If the taste and coloring were different, would the tongue taste what the eye saw? Or would the eye see what the tongue tasted?”


Read the article here at Small Business Trends.  And be sure to read the comments.


Be sure to Follow Your Business Professor @JackYoest on Twitter.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
Posted by Jack & Charmaine Yoest on 08/07 at 10:04 AM
(0) CommentsPermalink

Is It Possible To Teach Business Ethics?

By Jack Yoest

basketball ref



Your Business Professor was teaching our 5-year-old boy some basketball moves in our backyard court.


Grab a jersey here. Push there. Lean. Scream.


Charmaine looked out the window from her home office. As a Kentucky Wildcats fan, she understands basketball’s contact nature, but she had never heard the narrative, the coaching.


“What are you doing?” she asked me.


“Teaching him how to cheat,” I said as I deftly showed my boy my favorite defensive move: How to gently touch the shooter’s arm without getting caught by the referee.


And I have another motivation. Knowing how to “bend” the rules would be a valuable skill if — more like, when! — he decides to run his own business. I am a forward-thinking father.


“I don’t think I like that.” She was worried about our boy. “Isn’t that how all those Tyco guys got started?”

I stopped to give her argument some consideration…


Read the story here.


Be sure to Follow Your Business Professor @JackYoest

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
Posted by Jack & Charmaine Yoest on 08/03 at 09:19 AM
(0) CommentsPermalink

The Planned Parenthood Baby Organ Profit Center

How much profit is in a baby liver?

About $11,000.

A few years ago Your Business Professor was needling his tax accountant. I asked him, “What will you do when everyone uses software to do taxes?” He says, “My business is growing and will continue—“

“But the numbers; the taxable income—the profit is easy to figure…”

He smiles, “But what is “profit?”

And that is the debate in #PlannedParenthood where #PPSellsBabyParts and #PPShoutYourStory

Your Business Professor teaches accounting students and graduate-level management classes. I also worked for decades in the medical business in tissue sampling, disposables and equipment.

So the debate on the profitability of organ donations caught my attention. Here’s the sell sheet,

The law is clear. Ovide Lamontagne, Esq., Americans United for Life, writes in National Review,

In particular, 42 U.S.C. 289g-2(a) makes it unlawful for any person “to knowingly acquire, receive, or otherwise transfer any fetal tissue for valuable consideration if the transfer affects interstate commerce” (emphasis added).

The law defines “valuable consideration” to exclude “reasonable payments associated with the transportation, implantation, processing, preservation, quality control, or storage of human fetal tissue.”

But like my CPA said, the “valuable consideration,” the remainder of sales minus expenses is open to interpretation.

The question becomes, Is $24,250 a “reasonable payment” in the sale of a human organ? Planned Parenthood claims they are just covering their expenses. StemExpress has spoken by taking their website offline.

So let’s look at what their expenses might be. Please let me know on Twitter @JackYoest http://www.twitter.com/jackyoest if my estimate for each line item is correct and if I have the services correct.

We can re-calibrate and update with the wisdom of crowds in the TwitterVerse.

(This is necessary since #PlannedParenthood and @StemExpress are not likely to comment. The Stem Express website was down, probably needing to spend more time with the family.)

Cost of Goods Sold

Planned Parenthood

Fifth month abortion 3,500

Harvest 425

Lab (misc) 275

Stem Express

Company overhead (per transaction) 1,200

Sales Representative commission (10% of sale) 2,425

Tech courier 180
Ground transportation 75
Dry Ice (Cryopreserved) 20

Igloo container 40

Charter Helicopter (three hours) 4,500

Processing fee for investigators 150

RNA Quality Check 100

Tissue Macrodissection 40

Expenses 12,930

Sale

Baby liver (tissue, issue one each) 24,250

Profit

11,320

I am using the complicated accounting formula: Sales – Expenses = Profit.

This higher, non-common-core, math gives us a real number: Eleven Large.

The Alert Reader will notice that I am combining the expenses for both #PlannedParenthood, which produces the goods for sale, and Stem Express, which is the channel of distribution (let’s not call them a middleman or rent–seeking parasite), to the end user.

The actual transportation/delivery costs might normally be done by a FedEx’er shipper. (Listed on the StemExpress website order form.) A bit cheaper than chartering a helicopter but I want to be underestimating and diplomatic to Dr. Frankenstein’s potential expenses at Planned Parenthood.

The #AlertStudent knows that in the formula these numbers are constants. But in normal business these forecasted numbers can have variation. Sales demand can go up or down and Expenses can go up or down. Profit is not guaranteed.

There is a chance that no profit could be made or that a company could lose money (I’ve done a lot of those…).

There is risk in business. Profit is the reward for managing this risk.

But would appear that there is little risk to deliver a liver. Stem Express gives Planned Parenthood a shopping list for the body parts needed and the abortionist can schedule a “donor” to fit the bill, so to say.

How much the “doctor” pressures the patient to “choose” abortion over life is not known. (Actually a pregnant women should be treated as two patients.)

Anyway, the abortionist will then modify the surgical procedure to extract the organ that was pre-ordered. There are no inventory carrying costs. There is minimal risk.

This is a nearly risk-free business and a very profitable business model.

But is it ethical or legal? Not likely. The profits seem to be far in excess above a break-even analysis. This can be determined in an independent audit.

Please tweet me your input @JackYoest and use #PPSellsBabyParts or comment.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
Posted by Jack & Charmaine Yoest on 07/31 at 06:45 AM
NewsPermalink

Obama Spokesman on Selling Aborted Baby Body Parts: We Will Not Defund Planned Parenthood

Just three days after saying that Planned Parenthood’s selling the body parts of aborted babies is “ethical,” President Barack Obama’s top spokesman this afternoon cut off a reporter and refused to discuss the issue further. The Obama official also confirmed President Obama will not agree to cut off taxpayer funding of the abortion company over the shocking news.
Read more

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
Posted by News Hound on 07/20 at 03:04 PM
NewsPermalink
Page 2 of 258 pages  <  1 2 3 4 >  Last »